Custom as a Source of Law: Tests of Validity

Exam Snapshot

Custom is a fundamental, historical source of law. For the TU LLB entrance, focus on the five core tests courts use to determine if a custom is legally binding. Expect MCQs on these individual tests, their definitions, and scenarios where a custom might fail. Also, understand its position relative to statutory law in Nepal.

Core Concept

A custom is a long-established, uniform pattern of human conduct that, through repeated and uncontested observance within a community, acquires the force of law. It's an unwritten rule, reflecting community practices that jurists and courts recognize as having legal authority. To be recognized as legally binding, a custom must pass five tests:

Nepal Law Anchors

Confusable Terms

Term Definition Legal Status
Custom Long-established, uniform practice. Binding law if valid.
Usage Pattern of behavior, often less ancient. Not law unless adopted into contract.
Tradition Cultural/historical belief/behavior. Not binding unless recognized as custom.

MCQ Traps

Example

In certain indigenous communities, specific inheritance rules based on ancient and continuous practices are often recognized by courts where statutory law is silent. However, a custom demanding caste-based discrimination would be held invalid immediately due to Article 18 of the Constitution (Right to Equality) and the Muluki Criminal Code, failing the tests of reasonableness and conformity with statute.

Memory Hook

Think of the "ACCRoNS" mnemonic for Custom validity: Antiquity, Continuity, Certainty, Reasonableness, Non-Statutory Conflict (Conformity with Statute).

Quick Revision